Video of debate ‘Are we all Ethnomusicologists Now?’ and responses
Posted: July 22, 2016 Filed under: Academia, Culture, Music - General, Musical Education, Musicology, New Music, Politics | Tags: alexander lingas, amanda bayley, ben smith, city university london, ethnomusicology, ian pace, laudan nooshin, michael spitzer, nicholas cook, paul harper-scott, rachel cunniffe, tore lind 3 CommentsThe video of the full debate which took place at City University on June 1st, 2016 ‘Are we all Ethnomusicologists Now?’, is now online for all to view.
Participants were Amanda Bayley (Bath Spa University), Tore Tvarnø Lind (Copenhagen University), Laudan Nooshin (City University), Ian Pace (City University) and Michael Spitzer (Liverpool University). The debate was chaired by Alexander Lingas (City University).
The following are some other important links: first, reports and responses to the debate by Rachel Cunniffe and Ben Smith
I have published my own position statement online here.
Nooshin’s position statement and slides can be found here.
A fuller response from me to Nooshin’s position statement is here.
This debate has generated much discussion more widely, and hopefully will continue to do so. Many thanks to everyone for taking part.
Desiring Progress 
[…] my position statement on the question ‘Are we all Ethnomusicologists Now?’ (the full debate can be viewed here – see also Michael Spitzer’s statement here and other responses to the event here), […]
[…] Video of debate ‘Are we all Ethnomusicologists Now?’ and responses (22/7/16) […]
[…] of the furious reactions on social media to the semi-serious conclusion to my contribution to the 2016 debate ‘Are we all ethnomusicologists now?’)** Tregear was adamant of the vital role of universities in bolstering and defending ‘the […]