Peter McKelvie’s response to Sir Tony Baldry MP

On June 13th, 2014, Peter McKelvie – who was the source for Tom Watson’s October 2012 question on high-level abuse based upon evidence from the investigation into Peter Righton – wrote to his local MP Sir Tony Baldry MP (Conservative, North Oxfordshire). The letter was reproduced on Spotlight, and I reproduce it here:

Dear Sir Tony,

You will no doubt be aware of the growing clamour, now joined by a cross-party group of over 40 MPs, for an Independent Hillsborough type Inquiry in to decades of organised abuse by networks that have infiltrated both the care system and the boarding school institutions of this country.

These networks include politicians, both national and local, from all political parties as well as residential social workers,police officers, teachers, judges, civil servants to name but a few.

You will no doubt be aware of the PMQ yesterday, 11th June, by Duncan Hames, until recently PPS to the Deputy Prime Minister, in which Mr.Hames asked for the Prime Minister’s support for such an Inquiry but Mr. Cameron felt that the Home Office had the situation under control and no further measure was required.

I am the retired Child Protection Team Manager who approached MP, Tom Watson, in October 2012, as a result of which Mr. Watson also asked a PMQ, on 24th October 2012 which subsequently led to the setting up of Operation Fernbridge by the Metropolitan Police.

You may recall that the PMQ involved the allegation that an elite paedophile ring had a link with No.10.

As you will know Operation Fernbridge is ongoing and I receive regular feedback on the progress of that investigation.

I would like to ask for your support as my local MP for an Independent Inquiry and would like an appointment with you please to discuss my reasons in much more detail.

On a website called Spotlightonabuse:The Past on Trial you will see my Open Letter to David Cameron, with copies to Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband and also their responses.

You will also see details of a meeting a close colleague, and acknowledged expert on child protection, and I had with Norman Baker, Minister of Justice at the Home Office on 15th May 2014.

I can forward you copies of all these documents at any point.

There are grounds to look closely at the behaviour of over 40 Members of the Commons and Lords, some living and some now dead, in connection with the actual abuse of very vulnerable children or with its cover up. This number is likely to grow during the course of a proper investigation.

I think the case against Cyril Smith and Peter Morrison is strong evidence of how easy it was for paedophiles to remain hidden within the corridors of power. Their cases are unfortunately the tip of the iceberg.

You are the ideal MP for me to approach not only because you are my constituent MP but because I understand that you are, according to your Wikipedia entry, “one of the last of those made a Minister by Margaret Thatcher still to be in the House of Commons”

The allegations I took to Tom Watson which resulted in the current Police investigations involve Mrs.Thatcher’s period as Prime Minister.

Many questions remain unanswered about a number of her key appointments and as her personal assistant in the 1974 General Election and, upon her becoming Leader of the Conservative Party in 1975, you joined her Private Office and so I must assume were very close to her and by definition some of the people I believe should be subject to an Independent Inquiry.

Your perspective could be extremely helpful.

The persistence of Mrs. Thatcher in pressing ahead with the Knighthood of Jimmy Savile despite opposition from her closest advisers, his alleged attendance at multiple private Chequers parties, his being granted the keys to Broadmoor in 1988, together with her appointment of Peter Morrison, a well known paedophile according to a number of fellow MPs, as her PPS raise many serious questions that need answering and only an Independent Inquiry on a Hillsborough based model will satisfy the electorate.

There are allegations against MPs of all parties under several different Governments and this is not a party political isue.

I can go in to much more detail in a face to face meeting but at this stage would ask for your support in joining the 40 plus MPs who have already pledged their support for an Independent Inquiry

Yours sincerely,

Peter McKelvie

Baldry sent a response to McKelvie, dated July 7th, 2014, and received today (July 9th), which is reproduced below:

Tony Baldry to McKelvie 1 - edited

Tony Baldry to McKelvie 2

Here is McKelvie’s reply sent today:

Dear Sir Tony

Thank you for your letter received today, by post on Wednesday 9th July 2014.

You state that you did not receive my letter via email.

I simply do not believe you. I have proof it was delivered.

Your reply to me is extremely rude, condescending and smacks of the arrogancy of a figure of the ruling classes that pays lip service to the electorate.

Let’s break down your reply.

1. I do not have a blog.

2. Your office would have received my email on 12th June 2014 ie 28 days ago

3. Why did the Banbury Guardian contact you to discuss an email you never received.

4. I note that you have taken the trouble to look at ” my blog ” ( I do not and never have had a blog ) on at least one occasion, but couldn’t reply to me until the 7th July, a significant date when you could sit back and think that your party had agreed entirely of it’s own volition to agree to a form of Independent Inquiry, and like the vast majority of your party’s MP’s could trot out the standard response.

5. ” You are clearly computer and email literate “. My family, friends and colleagues would find that very amusing.

I am of the generation, and a Luddite to boot, where IT skills have passed me by and am almost a one finger typist who wouldn’t know what an app was if it hit me in the face.

6. You state ” why if you didn’t get a response you didn’t subsequently get in touch to check I had received your email”.

I am actually computer literate enough to know if I send an email to the correct address and it isn’t returned undelivered with a failure message then I know it’s been received.

7. ” Indeed, given the seriousness of this issue I can’t imagine why you would think if I had received a letter or email from you that I wouldn’t want to respond straightaway “.

I assumed and I believe it to be the case with you, that you were one of the large majority of MP’s who failed to answer constituents letters re. the specific issues I raised with you, and were stalling and refusing to recognise the unprecedented surge of people power and anger until your leadership could instruct you on the party line, which in your case came remarkably on the very day that you decided to reply to me ie 7th July, when your hitherto resistant Government were forced in to a humiliating climbdown to agree to a shadow of the type of Inquiry that Survivors of child sexual abuse have been long demanding.

You enclose the Home Office Oral Statement Monday 7th July 2014 Child Abuse. I received a personal copy within an hour of it being released.

Your reply to someone who has campaigned for justice for survivors of child sexual abuse for over 30 years is as demeaning, insulting and condescending as the replies I have received for nearly 2 years from Mr. Cameron and the Home Office and shows the same level of disdain for a mere member of the public like myself as Mr. Norman Baker showed to me and a recognised child protection expert in a sham meeting with him earlier this year.

I refuse to believe that your office did not receive my email

I am attaching your letter for the attention of the people I am copying in to your reply

Yours sincerely

Peter McKelvie


4 Comments on “Peter McKelvie’s response to Sir Tony Baldry MP”

  1. bobchewie says:

    I notice in past few days a controlled move using the media

    1 in newspaper some crap headline about how people were outraged that a judge was not appointed as head of an enquiry ( really? Who were these outraged people ..not me or anyone I know)

    2 a Claire Dyer or somebody shows up in guardian claiming Butler Schloss is the best thing since sliced bread and bestest person ever to head an enquiry ..( who is ms Dyer I ask )

    3 around this time our nemesis in chief and hired paid disinfo goon Anna Macaroony and her gang of misfits rubbishing anti paedo activists as conspiri loons and bandwagon jumpers
    She then goes on to portray anyone none too keen Butler Schlosspot as some misery monger who has no idea that BS is the godsend we’ve been waiting for..
    But then what do you expect from a savilles crucifux wearing ( Saint Jimmy) cheif fan member
    And acolyte of Duncroft head ma’am who suggested that the ladies there were common prostitutes and what else do you expect from someone who is fans of no less than Tom O Caroll that nonce child convicted child raper
    As is the rest of her twisted cronies including
    the late nonce Peter Brighton old mucker Maggie Pervertis

    OK chuck the funny joke from the Met about having
    Proper professional investigators instead of amateur ones …did he mean the cover up cops??
    Like the ones in Lambeth nick making money out of abusing kids in a police cell and that case being covered up by an internal disciplinary investigation and the documents destroyed

    So yeah you can shove your Judge BS and the rest of the establishment cronies


  2. […] Peter McKelvie’s response to Sir Tony Baldry MP (9/7/14) […]

  3. […] Peter McKelvie's response to Sir Tony Baldry MP. […]

  4. Liz727 says:

    Way to go, Bob!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s